Design questions for a home-made 1600x1000mm(63x39") CO2 laser
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2025
Hello, I'm new to this forum and the whole laser scene. I've watched a lot of Russ's videos and I find them really interesting.
Right now, I'm in the design process for a CO2 laser. I want it to be a cutting monster, I'll rarely do engraving. I'll mostly do fabric cutting but want to cut thick plywood and MDF as well. Up to a thickness of about ~20 to 25mm(~3/4 to 1")
I've watched Russ's videos about beam expansion and the power curve, but don't know what is practical in the real world. Both design-wise and component selection.
Is it better to use the traditional layout of the CO2 laser with a stationary tube in the back? I guess the up-side is lesser moving mass and lesser mechanical wear on the tube, but the down-side is a really long beam-length and also beam-expansion. I could also fit a longer higher power tube (my budget would allow for a maximum of a 130w tube)
Or should I go with a tube mounted to the moving gantry? Up-side would be a shorter beam-length and a smaller beam-expansion. But the down-side is more mechanical wear on the tube and higher mass on the moving components. Going with this style would limit the length of the tube to about 90w, but that would be really nice for the budget.
In essence, is a lower powered tube with a shorter beam-length better than a higher power tube with a longer beam-length? For maximum cutting depth on the whole surface.
I've attached a few pictures of the layout.
Right now, I'm in the design process for a CO2 laser. I want it to be a cutting monster, I'll rarely do engraving. I'll mostly do fabric cutting but want to cut thick plywood and MDF as well. Up to a thickness of about ~20 to 25mm(~3/4 to 1")
I've watched Russ's videos about beam expansion and the power curve, but don't know what is practical in the real world. Both design-wise and component selection.
Is it better to use the traditional layout of the CO2 laser with a stationary tube in the back? I guess the up-side is lesser moving mass and lesser mechanical wear on the tube, but the down-side is a really long beam-length and also beam-expansion. I could also fit a longer higher power tube (my budget would allow for a maximum of a 130w tube)
Or should I go with a tube mounted to the moving gantry? Up-side would be a shorter beam-length and a smaller beam-expansion. But the down-side is more mechanical wear on the tube and higher mass on the moving components. Going with this style would limit the length of the tube to about 90w, but that would be really nice for the budget.
In essence, is a lower powered tube with a shorter beam-length better than a higher power tube with a longer beam-length? For maximum cutting depth on the whole surface.
I've attached a few pictures of the layout.